Identification the Factors Influencing Decentralized Decisions Made by Education Managers

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

1 PhD Student, Department of Educational Management, Kazerun Branch, Islamic Azad University, Kazerun, Iran.

2 Associate Professor, Department of Educational Management, Kazerun Branch, Islamic Azad University, Kazerun, Iran

3 Associate Professor, Department of Educational Management, Kazerun Branch, Islamic Azad University, Kazerun, Iran.

Abstract

In decentralized education systems, decisions are made through legislative bodies, elected public councils, and trustees. The main purpose of this research is to identify and prioritize the factors influencing the decentralized decision making of education managers. It is a qualitative applied study. Data were collected through semi-structured interviews and questionnaires whose validity was confirmed by university professors and experts and its reliability was calculated using Cronbach's alpha coefficient of 0.870. Decentralized recruitment of managers was done by thematic analysis and Friedman test. The results of the content analysis findings led to the identification of 4 organizer themes, 17 basic themes and 81 sub-themes. Finally, prioritizing the results with Friedman test showed that from the experts' point of views, lack of comprehensive rules and regulations associated with decentralization (environmental factor) is the first priority with the most influence while technical skill (management factor) is the last priority with the least impact on decentralized decisions of education managers.

Keywords


  1. Achmad, S. H. (2017). The Effect of Competency, Motivation, And Organizational Culture On The Employee Performance At The Jayakarta Hotel,Bandung, Indonesia. Journal of Business on Hospitality and Tourism, 2(1), 11-
  2. Alvani, Seyyed Mahdi (2016). Decision Making and State Policy,Tehran:HumanitiesTextbooks Organization[In Persian].
  3. Arefi, Mahboubeh (2007) Analysis of the Decentralization Approach in the Human Resources Based Education System of Iran, Journal of Educational Sciences and Psychology of Sistan and Baluchestan, 10 (4), 101-194. [In Persian].
  4. Bahrampour, Abolfazl (2009). A Critique of Education Inefficiency, Tehran: Baysat Publications[In Persian].
  5. Bayati, A., ghasemizad, A., Taheri, A. (2019). Investigating the Causes of hindering the Implementation of Decentralized Management in Educational Offices in Western Counties of Isfahan Province with the Approach of the Foundation Data Theory. Educational Development of Judishapur, 10(Supplement), 67-78.
  6. Hafez Nia, Mohammadreza (2016). An Introduction to Research in Humanities, Tehran: Post Publication. [In Persian].
  7. Hwang, J. J., Yu, C. C., & Chang, C. Y. (2006). School improvement in Taiwan: 1987–2003. School improvement: International perspectives, 201-212.
  8. Jahanian, Ramazan (2012). Knowledge and Skills of Educational Managers, Journal of Educational Management, No. 1. [In Persian].
  9. Kharrazi, Seyed Kamal (2011). Fundamentals of Cognitive Education, Tehran: Post Publication. [In Persian].
  10. Panicker, S., & Manimala, M. J. (2015). Successful turnarounds: the role of appropriate entrepreneurial strategies. Journal of Strategy and Management, 8(1), 21-40
  11. Saadat, Esfandiar (2013). Decision Making in Organization, Tehran: Tehran University Press. [In Persian].
  12. Salsabili, Nader (2013). Education System Reform Charter, Tehran: Education Research Institute Publications[In Persian].