Document Type : Research Paper
Authors
1
Ph.D Candidate in Educational Psychology, Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran
2
Professor in Educational Psychology, Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, Allameh Tabatabaee, University, Tehran, Iran
3
Associate Professor in Assessment and Measurement, Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, Allameh Tabatabaee, University, Tehran, Iran
Abstract
Introduction & Objective: One of the common problems among students is low level of motivation and increased academic burnout. The aim of this study was to investigate the causal relationship between attachment styles and students' academic burnout mediated by academic engagement.
Methodology: The research method was descriptive and correlational design and structural equation modeling method. The statistical population was all male and female undergraduate students studying in the academic year 2016-2017 at the Islamic Azad University of Quchan. The sample of 403 people was selected through Cochran's formula and cluster sampling. Research tools include: 1. Collins Attachment Styles Scale (1996). In the original version, Cronbach's alpha coefficient for secure attachment was 0.81, avoidance attachment was 0.78, and anxiety attachment was 0.85. The validity of this scale was favorable and the reliability coefficient of the whole questionnaire was calculated to be 0.60. 2. Maslash Academic Burnout Scale (2002). In the present study, the total reliability coefficient of 0.85 and the reliability coefficient for the subscales of academic burnout (exhaustion, cynicism and low self-efficacy) were 0.85, 0.80, and 0.75, respectively. 3. Frederick and Bloomfeld and Paris Academic engagement Scale (2004). Scale designers reported the reliability coefficient of this scale as 0.86. In the present study, the total reliability coefficient of the questionnaire was 0.83. In order to analyze the data, fit indices and path coefficients were extracted.
Results: The results showed that all subscales of the study have significant factor loads. Safe style had a significant negative correlation with academic burnout mediated by academic engagement. Anxiety style did not have a significant relationship with academic burnout mediated by academic engagement, and avoidance style mediated by academic engagement had a positive and significant relationship with academic burnout.
Conclusion: Safe and avoidant styles play a role in explaining and predicting academic burnout. These styles are influenced by academic motivation on the one hand and can have significant effects on students' academic burnout on the other hand.
Keywords