سنجش الگوی مفهومی مدیریت بهره‌وری در اداره کل آموزش و پرورش فارس

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 استادیار دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی واحد شیراز

2 کارشناس ارشد مدیریت آموزشی،دبیر آموزش و پرورش استان فارس

چکیده

هدف از این پژوهش، سنجش الگوی مفهومی مدیریت بهره‌وری از دیدگاه کارکنان سازمان آموزش وپرورش فارس بود. روش پژوهش، توصیفی از نوع همبستگی بود. جامعه‌ی آماری241 نفر از کارشناسان سازمان آموزش و پرورش فارس بودند که آزمودنی‌های پژوهش بر اساس جدول مورگان به گونه‌ی تصادفی طبقه‌ای 159 نفر تعیین شدند. برای گرد‌آوری داده‌ها، دو پرسشنامه به سبک لیکرت تنظیم شد. یک پرسشنامه برای سنجش مؤلفه‌های الگوی موردنظر که شامل: عوامل گروهی، عوامل قانونی، عوامل جلب رضایت مراجعین، عوامل حمایتی، عوامل کیفی، تفکر منطقی و وجدان کاری بود و پرسشنامه‌ای نیز برای اندازه گیری بهره وری تنظیم شد. پایایی پرسشنامه سنجش مؤلفه‌های الگوی مدیریت بهره‌وری بر اساس آلفای کرونباخ 87/0 و پایایی پرسشنامه بهره وری 97/0 گردید. باکمک ضریب همبستگی پیرسون عوامل مورد آزمون قرار گرفتند، بر اساس نتایج بدست آمده، کلیه‌ی متغیرها همبستگی مثبت و معناداری با بهره‌وری داشتند و همگی از عوامل موثر بر بهره‌وری کارکنان بودند. برای پیش بینی بهره وری بر اساس الگوی مورد نظر در سازمان آموزش و پرورش از رگرسیون چند متغیره استفاده گردید که مشخص شد عوامل تفکر منطقی، عوامل گروهی و جلب رضایت مراجعین توانایی پیش بینی بهره‌وری را دارند

کلیدواژه‌ها


عنوان مقاله [English]

Evaluating the Conceptual Pattern of Productivity Management in Fars Educational Organization

نویسندگان [English]

  • A Taheri 1
  • T Goldahan 2
  • S.M Sayedi 1
چکیده [English]

This research aimed at evaluating the conceptual pattern of productivity management from the viewpoints of employees in Fars Educational Organization. The research method was descriptive-correlational. The target population included 241 individuals. The sample of the study consisted of 159 employees in consultation with Morgan’s table. Two Likert-scale questionnaires were adapted to collect data. One of them measured the conceptual pattern components such as group factors, legal factors, customer satisfying factors, supporting factors, qualitative factors, logical thinking, and working conscientiousness and the other one assessed productivity. The reliability of the conceptual pattern and productivity questionnaires were 0. 87 and 0.97 respectively as assessed through Cronbach’s alpha. A use was made of Pearson correlation coefficient to analyze factors. The results of the study indicated that all factors had a significantly positive correlation with productivity and impacted it. In order to predict productivity, based on the respective pattern in the organization, multiple regression analysis was employed. It showed that logical thinking, group factors, and customer satisfying factors could predict productivity.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • evaluation
  • Conceptual Pattern
  • Productivity Management
  • Employees of Fars Educational Organization
Al daft,R.(1995).Organizational theory and structural design .institute of
commercial research studies.433-434.
 Alvani,S.M.(1998).General management.Tehran:ney.11th edition.
 Alipour,Z.(2005).Relative importance of human on occupational productivity
in traffic and Transportation organization .Master`s Thesis. Allamehe
 Tabatabaey University of Tehran.
 Bagheri,A.(2004).The effect of in-service training on the productivity of
employee in Islamabad agricultural Jihad .Master`s Thesis. College of
Educationl science and psychology.Teacher Training University of Tehran.
 Belcher,J.(2000).Comprehensive guidance for productivity management
.Tehran : karafrinan .1st edition.
 Behnam,F.(2009).Study the effect of innovation and creativity on labor
productivity in shiraz refinery employees in 2008-2009 .Master`s Thesis
.Islamic Azad University Marvdasht Branch.
 Deraker,P.O.(1999).Management challenges in 21st
century.Thehran:rasa.1stedition.
 Dennis, R., and David, B. (2007). In corporation satisfaction measures into
restaurant productivity index hospitality management, 26.352-361.
 Dertouzos, M.L., and Lester, R.K., and solow, R.M. (1989). Made in
America: Regaining the Productive Edge.New York: Harper perennial.
 Dunham.Taylor J.(2000). Nurse executive trans of motional leader found in
participative organizations.Journal of Nursing Administration, 30(5).241-250.
 English (2009).Journal Y information and SOFTWARE Technology
.Hashemzadeh,M.(1997).Comparative study of managers and teachers view in
male high schools Ghomcity ,effective factors on improving labor productivity
in 1996-1997.Master`s Thesis .Shahid Beheshti University.
 Hippo, Y. (1993). There diction in working time, Futures, 25. 537-550.
 Khaki,GH.(1995).Role of work conscience on increasing organizational
productivity .zamyne 53,54.18-21.
 Khaliliyeshurini,S.(1996).The effect of official trainings on productivity
level improvement.Controller,1.102-112.
 Loke,C.F. J. (2001). Leadership behaviors: effects on job satisfaction,
productivity and organizational commitment. Journal of nursing management,
N4. 191-204. VO9.
- Lincoln, R.J. (1991). Employee work Attitudes and management practice in
U.S. and Japan. Evidence form a large comparative survey, in motivation and
work behavior. 326-341.
 Mayet,M.(2008).productivity management and solutions for Its improvement
in shiraz fine department .Master`s Thesis .Islamic University Shiraz Branch.
 Rahgozar,H.(2002).Study the view of shiraz University experts and managers
about factors effecting on experts productivity .Master`s Thesis. Shiraz
University.
 Saatchi,M.(2001).productivity psychology .Tehran :virayesh.2nd edition.
 Saatchi,M.(2002).study the human obstructions and factors from the
viewpoints of managers in organization included in social providing low
.Management Studies.37,38.
 Sepehr,M.B.(1998).Study the effects factors of labor productivity from west
Azarbayejan`s executing organization employees. Master`s Thesis. degree.
Government Management Central Office.
 Soltani,E.(1998).The role of labor development in organizational
productivity improvement.Government management,39.59-76.
 Soltany,E.(2007).human resources productivity.Esfahan:arkan.2nd edition.
 Shafiey,N.(1999).labour adequate performance ,important factor for
improving organizational productivity .Summit of the administration and
development.
 Sarafyzade,A.(2004).Information technology in organization. Tehran: mir.
 Taheri,SH.(2006).productivity and Its analysis in
organizations.Tehran:hestan.12th edition.