ارائه مدل پارادایمی دو سوتوانی سازمانی در نظام آموزش وپرورش

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

• منصور زند ¹
• بدری شاه طالبی ²
• محمدعلی نادی ²

¹ . دانشجوی دکتری مدیریت آموزشی، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، واحد اصفهان (خوراسگان )، اصفهان، ایران

² دانشیار گروه مدیریت آموزشی، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، واحد اصفهان (خوراسگان )، اصفهان، ایران

10.30495/jedu.2023.31143.6244

چکیده

مقدمه و هدف: در چند سال اخیر، مفهوم دوسو توانی به طور فزاینده ای زمینه ی تحقیقات بسیاری از محققان شده است. پژوهش حاضر با هدف ارائه مدل پارادایمی دوسوتوانی سازمانی در نظام آموزش وپرورش دولتی ایران  انجام شد.
روش شناسی پژوهش: پژوهش حاضر به روش کیفی و به طور خاص روش نظریه ی داده بنیاد صورت گرفته است. جامعه آماری پژوهش حاضر، متخصصان و کارشناسان نظام آموزش و پرورش و مدیریت آموزشی در ایران بوده است. نمونه گیری پژوهش به صورت هدفمند انجام شد. هم چنین از نمونه گیری نظری برای نمونه گیری از داده ها به منظور رسیدن به اشباع نظری استفاده شده است. تعداد نمونه ها در این پژوهش، 17 نفر بوده است. داده های پژوهش حاضر بر مبنای مصاحبه نیمه ساخت یافته با متخصصان و کارشناسان نظام آموزش و پرورش و مدیریت آموزشی (استادان دانشگاه، مدیران آموزش و پرورش و واحدهای آموزشی وکارشناسان مدیریت آموزشی)  جمع آوری شده اند.
یافته­ ها و نتیجه گیری: یافته ها حکایت از آن دارد که عواملی مانند توسعه محیط رقابتی و تحول در مفهوم بالندگی می تواند ناتوانی آموزش وپرورش در پاسخ به تغییرات درونی و بیرونی را جبران و تغییر در تکنولوژی و نوآوری های آموزشی را به همراه داشته باشد بررسی نتایج حاکی از آن است که فقدان انگیزش در حوزه ی نوآوری ، ساختار متمرکز و غیر قابل انعطاف نظام آموزشی، فقدان دسترسی مستقل به منابع انسانی و فناورانه و وجود مدیرانی واقع بین و تحول گرا در سازمان های آموزشی می تواند زمینه وبستر دوسوتوانی را در این نهاد توسعه بخشد. دوسوتوانی سازمانی دارای پیامدهایی از جمله بالندگی سازمانی، ارتقای سطح رضایت سازمانی و توسعه ی پایدار در نظام آموزشی با توجه به نتایج این پژوهش می باشد.

کلیدواژه‌ها

• دوسوتوانی سازمانی
• نظام آموزش وپرورش
• نظریه داده بنیاد

---

عنوان مقاله [English]

Presenting a paradigm model of organizational ambidexterity in the Iranian public education system

نویسندگان [English]

• mansour zand ¹
• badri shahtalebi ²
• mohammad ali nadi ²

¹ PhD Student in Educational Management, Islamic Azad University, Isfahan Branch(Khorasgan) Isfahan, Iran.

² Associate Professor Department of Educational Sciences, Islamic Azad University, Isfahan Branch(Khorasgan) Isfahan, Iran.

چکیده [English]

Introduction: In recent years, the concept of ambidexterity has increasingly become the research field of many researchers. The present research was conducted with the aim of providing a paradigmatic model of organizational duality in the Iranian public education system.
research methodology: The current research was carried out using a qualitative method, specifically the method of grounded theory. The statistical population of the present study was the specialists and experts of the education system and educational management in Iran. Sampling of the research was done purposefully. Also, theoretical sampling was used to sample the data in order to reach theoretical saturation.The number of samples in this research was 17 people. The data of the current research were collected based on semi-structured interviews with specialists and experts of the education system and educational management (university professors, managers of education, and educational management experts).
Findings: The findings indicate that factors such as the development of the competitive environment and evolution in the concept of growth can compensate for the inability of education to respond to internal and external changes and bring changes in technology and educational innovations. Also, the results indicate that the lack of motivation in the field of innovation, the centralized and inflexible structure of the educational system, the lack of independent access to human and technological resources, and the existence of realistic and transformational managers in educational organizations can lead to Webster Dusotvani's field  in This institution will develop.
Conclusion:Organizational ambidexterity  has consequences such as organizational growth, improvement of organizational satisfaction and sustainable development in the educational system according to the results of this research
 

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

• Organizational ambidexterity
• Education system
• Grounded theory

مراجع

1.Amjad, A., & Md Nor, K. (2020). Organizational ambidexterity: The state of global research using bibliometric analysis on Scopus database. Journal of Xi’an University of Architecture & Technology, 12(5), 1522–1540. DOI: 10.1177/21582440221082127

2.Brix, J. (2019). Ambidexterity and organizational learning: revisiting and reconnecting the literatures. Learning Organization,26(4), 337–351. DOI: 10.1177/21582440221082127

3.Corbin, J., Strauss, A., & Strauss, A. L. (2014). Basics of qualitative research. Sage. DOI:20.1001.1.20086369.1399.11.45.6.3

4.Chavoshi , E.,Shahtalebi ,B., &  Ebrahimzadeh,R.(2021) . Multi-Layered Research Orientedness: Presenting a Research-Based School Paradigm Model. Journal of New Approaches in Educational Adminstration. Journal of New Approaches in Educational Adminstration .,(54),133-166  DOI:20.1001.1.20086369.1399.11.45.6.3

5.Creswell, J. W. (2012). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall. (pp. 146-166). DOI:20.1001.1.20086369.1399.11.45.6.3

6.Danneels, E. (2006). Dialogue on the effects of disruptive technology on firms and industries. Journal of Product Innovation Management,23(1): 2-4. DOI:10.1111/j.1540-5885.2005.00174.x

7.Dezi, L., Ferraris, A., Papa, A., & Vrontis, D. (2019). The role of external embeddedness and knowledge management as antecedents of ambidexterity nd performances in Italian SMEs. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 68(2), 360–369.DOI:10.1109/TEM.2019.2916378

8.Diesel, R., & Scheepers, C. B. (2019). Innovation climate mediating complexity leadership and ambidexterity. Personnel Review, 48(7), 1782–1808.Doi:10.1108/PR-11-2018-0445

9.Geer, N., Kujawa, J. & Patureau-Mirand, B. (2013). Ambidextrous objects and trace functions for nonsemisimple categories. Proceedings of the American Mathematical Society, 141(9):2963-2978.Doi:10.48550/arXiv.1106.4477

10.Gianzina-Kassotaki, O. (2017). Leadership and ambidexterity: Amultilevel analysis of the aerospace and defense organizations.PhD thesis, University of Warwick.DOI: 10.1177/21582440221082127

11.Gibson, C. B., & Birkinshaw, J. (2004). The antecedents, consequences, and mediating role of organizational ambidexterity. Academy of management Journal, 47(2), 209-226. doi:10.2307/20159573

12.Gieske, H., Duijn, M., & van Buuren, A. (2019). Ambidextrous practices in public service organizations: Innovation and optimization tensions in Dutch water authorities. Public

Management Review, 22(3), 341–346. DOI: 10.1080/14719037.2019.1588354

13.He ; Zin – Li & Wong . (2004) . Exploration Vs . Exploitation : An Empirical Test of the Ambidexterity Hypothesis . Organization Science . Vol . 15 , No . 4 , 481-494. Doi:10.1287/orsc.1040.0078

14.Heyden, M. L. M., Sidhu, J., & Volberda, H. (2018). The conjoint influence of top and middle management characteristics on management innovation. Journal of Management, 44(4), 1505–1529. Doi:10.1177/0149206315614373

15.Katou, A. A., Budhwar, P. S., & Patel, C. (2021). A trilogy of organizational ambidexterity: Leader’s social intelligence, employee work engagement and environmental changes.

Journal of Business Research, 128, 688–700. Doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.01.043

16.Khoshnoud,S., &  Chenari,A.R.(2022). Provide a conceptual framework of organizational architecture in the higher education system in virtual electronics. Journal of New Approaches in Educational Adminstration . August and September.  13. (3) . Doi: 10.30495/JEDU.2022.28533.5726

17.Kooravand, S., Bahmaee, L., & Barekat,G.(2022). Investigating the effective factors on the decision-making power of high school managers in order to present a model for improving decision-making power. Journal of New Approaches in Educational Adminstration. October and November.  13(4). Doi: 10.30495/JEDU.2022.25501.5081

18.Junni, P., Sarala, R., Taras, V., & Tarba, S. (2013). Organizational ambidexterity and performance: A meta-analysis. Academy of Management Perspectives, 27(4), 299–312. Doi:10.5465/amp.2012.0015

19.Maclean, M., Harvey, C., & Golant, B.D. (2020). The role of lnnovatior

Namatives in Accomplishing Organizational Ambidexterity . Published January 21. Doi:10.1177/1476127019897234

20.March, J. G. (1991). Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning. Organization Science, 2(1), 71–87.Doi:10.1287/orsc.2.1.71

21.Nel, F. P., Milburn-Curtis, C., & Lehtisaari, K. (2020) . Successful Exploration : Organizational Ambidexterity and Performance in News Media Firms . Nordic Journal of Media Management. Doi:10.5278/njmm.2597-0445.3495

22.Paliokaite,A., & pacesa , N.(2015).The relationship between organizational foresight and organizational ambidexterity. Tehnological Forecasting & Social Change . 101 , 165-181. Doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2014.03.004

23.Pellegrinelli, S., Murray-Webster,R., & Turner,N. (2015). Facilitating organizational ambidexterity through the complementary use of projects and programs. International. Journal of Project Management, 33(1): 153-164. Doi:10.1016/j.ijproman.2014.04.008

24.Tushman, M. L., & O’Reilly, C. A. (2013). Organizational ambidexterity: Past, present and future. Academy of Management Perspectives, 27(4), 324–338. Doi:10.2139/ssrn.2285704

25.Van Doorn, S., Tretbar, T., Reimer, M., & Heyden, M. (2020). Ambidexterity in family firms: The interplay between family influences within and beyond the executive suite. Long Range Planning. Advance online publication. Doi:10.1016/jlrp.2020.101998

26.Venugopal, A., Krishnan, T. N., Upadhyayula, R. S., & Kumar, M. (2020). Finding the microfoundations of organizational ambi dexterity—Demystifying the role of top management behav ioural integration. Journal of Business Research,106(August), 1–11. Doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.08.049

27.Wang, C. L., & Rafiq, M. (2014). Ambidextrous organizational culture, Contextual ambidexterity and new product innovation: a comparative study of UK and C hinese high‐tech Firms. British Journal of management, 25(1), 58-76.Doi:10.1111/j.1467-8551.2012.00832.x

28.Wilden, R., Hohberger, J., Devinney, T. M., & Lavie, D. (2018). Revisiting James March (1991): Whither exploration and exploitation? Strategic Organization, 16(4), 352–369. Doi:10.1177/1476127018765031