ارائه چارچوبی برای پاسخگویی به محیط در برنامه درسی آموزش عالی

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

• جعفر ترک زاده ¹
• وارث پارسه ²
• رحمت اله مرزوقی ³
• مهدی محمدی ¹

¹ دانشیار بخش مدیریت و برنامه ریزی آموزشی دانشگاه شیراز.

² دانش آموخته دکتری دانشگاه شیراز

³ استاد بخش مدیریت و برنامه ریزی آموزشی دانشگاه شیراز.

چکیده

   پژوهش حاضر با هدف تدوین چارچوب مفهومی برنامه درسی پاسخگو به محیط در آموزش عالی، با استفاده از دیدگاه متخصصان و صاحب نظران مجرّب و مرتبط با موضوع به روش تحقیق مطالعه موردی کیفی پرداخته است. مشارکت­کنندگان این پژوهش کیفی شامل یازده نفر از متخصصان و صاحب نظران برنامه­ریزی درسی می باشد. که انتخاب مشارکت کنندگان با استفاده از رویکرد هدفمند و با روش انتخاب صاحب نظران کلیدی و استفاده از معیار اشباع نظری و گردآوری اطلاعات با استفاده از مصاحبه نیمه ساختاریافته، انجام گردید. اطلاعات حاصل با استفاده از روش تحلیل مضمون و تشکیل شبکه مضامین تحلیل گردید و بر آن مبنا به احصای مضامین فراگیر، سازمان دهنده و پایه ای مربوط به چارچوب پاسخگویی برنامه درسی در آموزش عالی پرداخته شده که اعتبار یافته ها با استفاده از مجموعه ای از روش های اعتبارپذیری، اتکاپذیری ، تأییدپذیری و انتقال پذیری، روش همسو سازی و کنترل تأیید و تأمین گردید. در نتیجه این پژوهش یک چارچوب پاسخگویی به محیط در برنامه درسی آموزش عالی مشتمل بر 18 عنصر برنامه درسی با 111 مؤلفه و ویژگی مربوطه تدوین گردید. عناصر مذکور عبارتند از: منطق برنامه درسی، منابع تعیین و تدوین اهداف، نیازسن جی، راهبرد اولویت بندی، مفهوم آموزش، مفهوم یادگیری، نقش مربّی، نقش متربّی، محیط های یادگیری، مکان آموزش و یادگیری، زمان آموزش و یادگیری، محتوا و منابع آموزش و یادگیری، ارزشیابی آموزش و یادگیری، اعتبار بخشی برنامه درسی، نظام برنامه ریزی درسی، مدیریت و نظارت بر اجرای برنامه درسی،  اقتضاء اندیشی و اولویت بندی، آسیب شناسی موانع اجرای برنامه درسی، ارزشیابی برنامه و اصلاح، بازنگری و تغییر برنامه درسی.

کلیدواژه‌ها

• پاسخگویی به محیط
• برنامه درسی
• آموزش عالی
• تحلیل مضمون

20.1001.1.20086369.1399.11.45.9.6

---

عنوان مقاله [English]

framework of Responding to environment in higher education curriculum

نویسندگان [English]

• t t ¹
• wares parse ²
• rahmatallah marzoghi ³
• mehdi mohammadi ¹

² shiraz university

³ shiraz university

چکیده [English]

Curriculum responsiveness is a new concept that can be re-created and utilized using existing scientific support that has been developed further in the fields of system and social-organizational science. Due to the of lack of necessary researches in this regard and vacuum of conceptual framework, and in order to comprehensively study the responsiveness of the curriculum, the present study aims to develop a conceptual framework of a responsive environment curriculum in higher education, qualitative case studies have been conducted by using the view of qualified and relevant experts. Potential participations were selected by using target approach, the method of selecting key experts, theoretical saturation criterion, and collecting information using semi-structured interviews. The data were analyzed using the method of thematic analysis and the formation of the themes network. Based on this, a comprehensive, organizing and basic themes of the framework of curriculum responsiveness in higher education was considered. The validity of the findings was determined and affirmed by using a collection of methods as credibility, dependability, conformability, transferability, triangulation and control. As a result of this study, As a result of this study, a framework of environmental responsiveness was developed in the curriculum of higher education consisting 18 elements with 111 components and related characteristics. The elements include: logic of curriculum, the sources of determining and compiling goals, Needs assessment, prioritization strategy, education concept, learning concept, role of a teacher, role of a student, learning environments, teaching- learning places, teaching- learning time, teaching – learning contents and resources, teaching – learning evaluation, curriculum validation, curriculum system, managing and controlling on curriculum performance, Deliberation and prioritization, Pathology Barriers of curriculum implementation, evaluation, correction, revision and change of the curriculum.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

• curriculum
• higher education
• Responsiveness
• environment

مراجع

• Akker, J., vanden, F., Daniel, M. H. (2010). A curriculum perspective on plurilingual education. SLO (Netherlands institute for curriculum development). Http /: www.coe.int/lang.
• Artely, w. (2001). The performance based for management. hand – book university of California. http/:www.orau.gov/pbm.
• Aliyari, Sh., Malik, H., Pazarargadi, M., Abbaspour, A. (2016). Developing and presenting a model of accreditation of the Nursing Curriculum of Nursing in Iran. Iranian Journal of Medical Education. Vol. 16, No. 39, PP. 340-328. [in persain]
• Alvandi. H. (2008). Curriculum accreditation. Journal Growth of Educational Guidance. Vol. 13, No. 8, PP. 21-19. [in persain]
• Attride - Stirling, J. (2001). Thematic networks: an analytic tool for qualitative research. Qualitative Research,Vol. 1, No. 3, PP. 385-405.
• Bazargan, A., Fatah Abadi, J., Einollahi, B. (2000). Appropriate Internal Evaluation Approach to Continuously Improve the Quality of Educational Departments in Medical Sciences Universities. Tehran: University of Tehran. Psychology and Educational Sciences. NO. 61, PP 1-26. [in persain]
• Braun, V., Clarke, V., & Terry, G. (2014). Thematic analysis. In P. Rohleder & A. Lyons (Eds.), Qualitative research in clinical and health psychology. Basingstoke: Palgrave MacMillan.
• Brown, L, D., Moore, M. H. (2001). Response, Strategy and International organizations, Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector, Quarterly. Vol. 30, N. 3, PP. 569-587.
• Byabangard, A. (2015). Educational Psychology (Teaching and Learning Psychology). Tehran: Editing publication. [in persain]
• Cutt, J., Murray, V. (2000). Response & Effectiveness, Evaluation Nonprofit Organizations. London and New York: Routledge.
• Damask, J. J. (2007).  Achieving goals in higher education. International Journal of Sustainability, Vol. 8, No. 1, PP. 53-68.
• Daniel, J.M. (2014). Toward a Multidimensional Concept of Curriculum: Understating Curriculum as Phenomenon, Field and Design, European Journal of Curriculum Studies. NO. 2, PP. 172-177.
• Desbrow, B., Leveritt, M., Palmer, M., & Hughes, R. (2014). Evaluation of a curriculum initiative designed to enhance the research training of dietetics graduates. Nutrition & Dietetics Journal. Vol. 71 (1), PP. 57- 63.
• Eisner, E. W. (2002): The Educational Imagination, On the Design and Evaluation of School Programs. New York: Macmillan College Publishing.
• Farasatkhah, M. (1998). Excellent educational challenges. Journal of Research and Planning for Higher Education. Vol. 17, PP. 130-119. [in Persian]
• Fathi vajargah, k. (2014). Principles and concepts of curriculum. Tehran: Ball Publishing. [in Persian].
• Fathi Vajargah, k., Shafiee, N. (2007). Quality Evaluation of Academic Curriculum (Case Study of Adult Education). Curriculum Studies. Vol. 2, N. 5, PP. 1-26. [in Persian].
• Fazli Khanim, M. (2008). Active teaching methods. Tehran: Tarbiat Publications. [in Persian].
• Fuller, M. (2014). Curriculum, views, approaches and perspectives. Curriculum implementation. (Translated by Gholamreza Khoynejad). Mashhad: Beh nashr.
• Fuizat, Y. (2018). Foundations of Educational Planning. Tehran: Nashr virayeh.[in Persian]
• Fomunyam, K.G., Teferra, D. (2017).  Higher Education Training and Development, University of KwaZulu-Natal.  Perspectives in Education.Vol. 35(2), PP. 196-207.
• Hanushek, E., Machin, S., Woessmann, L. (2011). Handbooks in Economics (vol. 3, PP. 383-421), The Netherlands: North-Holland.
• Hatch, M. J., & Cunliffe, A. L. (2013). Organization theory: modern, symbolic and postmodern perspectives. Oxford university press.
• Hicks, k. (2007). Curriculum in higher education in Australia –Hello? Paper presented at 30th HERDA Annual con ference.8-11 July 2007 Adelaide, Australia. Available at: www. herdsa. org .au/wp-content /uploads/conference/2007/PPF/R/P227.dpf.last Visit.15/5/2009.
• Hoy, K, W., & Miskel, G. C. (2013). Educational Administration: Theory, Research, and Practice. McGraw Hill, Hill Companies Inc., 1221.
• Jegers, M., & Lapsley, I. (2001). Making Sense of Non-Profit Organizations, Financial Response and Management,Vol. 17 (1), PP. 1-3.
• Jahani, J. (2009). educational creativity from theory to practice. Tehran: Institute for Cultural and Social Studies. [in persain]
• klein, J. (1989).  parenthetic learning in organizations: Toward the unlearning of the unlearning model.  journal of management studies, Vol. 26, N. 3, PP. 291- 308.
• Kiani, G., Latifi, F. (1999). Organizational Health Indicators in the 21st Century. Tadbir Magazine, Vol. 100, PP. 2-28. [in persain]
• Khaleghi nejgad, S, A., Maleki, H., and Salmani, B. (2014). Assistance based on the needs in higher education curricula. The first conference of evaluates in academicals systems. Sharif University of Technology.
• Lewy, a. (2012). Planning the school curriculum (Translation by Farideh Mashayekh). Tehran: School Publications. [In Persian]
• Li, H. (2006). School-Based Curriculum Development: An Interview Study of Chinese kindergartens, Early Childhood Education Journal, Vol. 33, No. 4, PP. 223-229.
• Maleki, H. (2016). Curriculum (Action Guide). Tehran: School Publications. [in Persian]
• Marofi, U., kiayamanesh, A., mehrmohammadi, M., aliasgari, M. (2007). Evaluation of teaching quality in higher education: survey of approaches”. Quarterly of curriculum studies. Vol. 1, No. 5, PP. 81-112. [In Persian]
• Marzooghi, R. (2016). Curriculum Typology. International Journal of English linguistics. Vol. 6, No. 7. PP. 166-170.
• Marzooghi, R. (2017). Science paradigms and curriculum theories: an analysis on philosophy and theorizing in the field of curriculum studies. Tehran: Avaya Noor Publications.
• Morley, L. (2001). Producing new workers: Quality and equality and employability in higher education. Quality in Higher Education. Vol.7, No.2, PP. 131-138.
• Mosleh Amiri, H. (2015). Evaluate the quality of universities and institutions of higher education. First International Conference on Management, Economics, Accounting and Education, Sari, PP. 30-44. [in Persian]
• Nili, M., Nasr. A., Sharif. M., Merhrmohammadi, M. (2010). Social Prerequisites and Outcomes of Accountable Curriculum in Higher Education Case Study: Public Universities of Isfahan. Journal of Applied Sociology, Vol. 21, N. 2, PP. 57-76.
• Pardakhtchi, M H., Bazargan, A., Arasteh, H., Mozafari, G. (2012). Academic Society's Perceptions on University External Accountability Gap. Journal of Research and Planning in Higher Education. N. 63, PP. 91-112. [in persain]
• Pashing, H. (2003). Process of accountability intellect doucs sys AB, vastra frolund, Sweden. www.hanles.gu. Se/ep/archive/00002915/01/Avhand lhng- hossein- pdf.
• Parvand, M. H. (2009). Preparations for educational and curriculum. Tehran: Shiveh Publications.
• Romzek, B. (2000). Dynamic of public sector Accountability in an era of reform, international Review of administrative science. No. 60, PP. 21-44.
• Sarmad, z., Vaziri, m. (1998). Characteristics of curriculum quality in higher education. Journal of Humanities, Alzahra University No. 24 & 25, PP. 151 – 166. [in persain]
• Sarmadi, M. R., Saif, M, H. (2014). class management. Tehran: Payame Noor University. [in persain]
• Scott, R. (2008). Organizations: Rational, Natural and Open Systems;( Translation by Hasan Mirzaharnejati and Flora Soltani Tirani). Tehran: The Organization for researching and Composing University textbooks in the humanities (samt). [in persain]
• Saif, A. A. (2019). Educational Psychology. Tehran: Agah Publications. [in persain]
• Salsbili, R. (2007). Transitioning the Iranian Curriculum System to Decentralization. Curriculum Studies Quarterly. Vol. 1, No. 4, PP. 68-49. [in persain]
• Silver, J., Alexander, W., and Louis, A. J. (1394). Lesson planning for better teaching and learning. Translated by Gholamreza Khoynejad. Mashhad: Astan Qods Razavi Publications. [in persain]
• Simonson, I., Nye, P. (1992). The effect of Response on susceptibility to decision errors. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes,Vol. 51, N.3, PP.416–446.
• Shafie poor motlagh, F., Rasti Barzaki, M. (2016). Presenting a model for determining the relationship between the responded educational planning and perceived evaluation of class on the basis of Mediation of Academic involvement. Research in Curriculum Planning, Vol.13, No.23, PP. 64-78. [in persain]
• Shariatmadari, A. (2014). Educational and scientific mission of educational centers. Tehran: samt. [in persain].
• Shabani, H. (2017). Educational skills (teaching methods and techniques). Tehran: Samt Publications. [in persain].
• Talebi, S., mazloomyan, S., Saif, M, H. (2015). Principles of Curriculum Planning. Tehran: pyam Noor. [in persain]
• Thompson, R. A. (2013). Socioemotional Development: Enduring Issues and New Challenges. Developmental Review, Vol. 13, No.6, PP. 372 – 402.
• Torkzadeh, J., Nekoumand, S. (2015). Validating the Scale of University's Power of Response to Environment. Journal of Research in Social Sciences and Humanities.No. 5, PP. 241-252. [in persain]
• Torkzadeh, J., Keshavarzi, F.  (2016). Evaluating the Effectiveness of Higher Education Curricula: An Environmental Response Approach. The 3rd National Conference & 10th international Conference of Quality assessment in university Systems. Tehran: Tehran University. PP. 250-263. [in persain]
• Torkzadeh, J., Nekoumand, S. (2014). Responsiveness to the environment, the fundamental challenge of universities in the current context. development of a behavioral system, 2nd National Conference on Applied Research in Management and Accounting. Tehran University. PP.158-167. [in persain].
• torkzadeh, j., Nekoumand, S., dehghan harati, F. (2013). a study of the organization’s prime functions in order to serve society development and some of their requirements. To see quarterly development management of the human resources and logistics, Vol.8, N. 28, PP. 39-64. [in persain].
• Yarmohammadian, M. H. (2018). Principles of Curriculum Development. Tehran: Ketab yadvareh. [in persain].
• Uys, L. R., Gwele, N. (2005). Curriculum development in nursing: process and innovations, London and New York: Routledge.
• Wolf, P., Hill, A., & Evers, F. (2006). Handbook for curriculum assessment, Ontario Canada: university of Guelph.