مؤلفه های اثرگذار بعد خدمات در انکوباتورهای دانشگاهی و نقش آن در ایجاد شرکت های زایشی دانشگاه

نویسندگان

• مریم حافظیان ¹
• محمد صالحی ²

¹ دانش آموخته دکتری مدیریت آموزشی دانشکده علوم انسانی، واحد ساری، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، ساری، ایران.

² دانشیاردانشکده علوم انسانی، واحد ساری ، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، ساری، ایران

چکیده

این پژوهش به شناسایی مؤلفه های اثرگذار بعد خدمات انکوباتورهای دانشگاهی که در تأسیس شرکت­های زایشی دانشگاه نقش دارند، پرداخت. روش پژوهش از نوع آمیخته و جامعه آماری شامل خبرگان و متخصصین در حوزه مراکز رشد در دانشگاه های استان مازندران بود. نمونه گیری در بخش مطالعۀ کیفی هدفمند و در بخش کمی تصادفی طبقه ای بود. در بخش کیفی تعداد 13نفر در فرآیند مصاحبه و در بخش کمی با حجم جامعه 304 نفر، 170 نفر به عنوان نمونه در این پژوهش مشارکت داشتند. ابزار جمع آوری اطلاعات شامل مصاحبه و پرسشنامۀ محقق ساخته بود که بعد از تأئید روایی، پایایی آن82/0 محاسبه گردید. برای تجزیه و تحلیل داده ها از آمار توصیفی و در بخش استنباطی از تحلیل عاملی اکتشافی و تأئیدی استفاده شد. نتایج پژوهش در بخش کیفی بیانگر آن بود که در ایجاد شرکت های زایشی دانشگاهی، 17 مؤلفه در بعد خدمات شناسایی شد. در بخش کمی، یافته ها نشان داد که مؤلفه کمک های مالیاتی با بالاترین بار عاملی (84/0)، و  مؤلفه تأمین منابع مالی با کمترین بار عاملی (40/0) از کل واریانس ها را تبیین و سایر مؤلفه ها نیز هر کدام به ترتیب در درجات بعدی اهمیت قرار گرفتند. همچنین الگوی نهایی پژوهش، با شاخص های برازش، ضرایب استاندارد مورد تأیید قرار گرفت. میزان ضریب تأثیر مؤلفه های موجود در خدمات انکوباتورهای دانشگاهی در ایجاد شرکت های زایشی دانشگاه به تنهایی بالاترین ضریب تأثیرگذاری در مؤلفه کمک های مالیاتی با 84/0 و کمترین در مؤلفه تأمین منابع مالی با 40/0 بود.

کلیدواژه‌ها

• انکوباتورها
• خدمات
• شرکت های زایشی
• مؤلفه های اثرگذار
• دانشگاه

20.1001.1.20086369.1395.7.25.1.0

---

عنوان مقاله [English]

Effective components of services in the university incubators and their role in the university spin-offs establishment

نویسندگان [English]

• M Hafezian ¹
• M Salehi ²

چکیده [English]

This study focused on identifying effective components in the university incubators services and their role in the university spin-offs establishment. The study adopted an integrated approach as its methodology. The statistical population included all college managers and experts in universities’ incubators in Mazandaran Province. Purposive sampling and stratified random sampling were used for qualitative and quantitative parts, respectively.170 subjects out of 304 participated in the quantitative part. 13 subjects were interviewed for the qualitative phase .The data gathering tools were interviews and a researcher-made questionnaire after confirming the validity and the reliability with Chronbach Alpha coefficient which was equal to (0/82). To analyze the data, the descriptive statistics and exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses were applied. Based on the content analysis of qualitative data from in-depth and exploratory interviews it was revealed that 17 components were identified in services aspect in the establishment of university spin-offs. Considering the quantitative aspect, the findings also emphasized that the Tax help with the highest factorial load (0/84) and provide financial resources with the lowest factorial load (0/40) explained the variances and other components had their prioritized relative contribution. Also, the final research model was approved considering the fit indexes and standard coefficients. Considering the impact factor of the existing components of the university incubators services in the establishment of university spin-offs, the greatest influencing amount was attributed to the Tax help with 0/84 and lowest was given to provide financial resources with (0/40).

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

• incubators
• services
• spin-offs
• effective components

مراجع

Abduh, M. D’Souza, C. Quazi, A. & Burley, H. T. (2007). Investigating and classifying clients’satisfaction with business incubator services. Anaging Service Quality,17(1),pp.47‐91.

Aghajani,Hasan Ali. Talebnejad,Atefe. (2011). Evaluation of performance of selected technology incubators in Iran, Journal of Entrepreneurship,Forth year,NO.13, P 149-165.

Aerts, K., Matthyssens, P., & Vandenbempt, K. (2007). Critical role and screening practices of European business incubators. Technovation, (27), pp. 254–267.

Allen, D. & McClusky, R. (1990). Structure, policy, and performance in the business incubator industry. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, pp. 61–77.

Becker, B., and Gassmann, O. (2006). Corporate incubators: Industrial R&D and what universities can learn from them. Journal of Technology Transfer, (31), pp. 469–483.

Benneworth, P.S.& charles,D.R. (2004). Overcoming learning uncertainties in the innovation process. The contribution of clustering to firms. Vol3. London: pergamon.

Bianchi,P. and N .Bellini.(1991). Public policies for local networks of innovators , Research policy,Vol.20, No. 5, Elsevier, pp. 487-497

Carayannis, E. G., & vonZedtwitz, M. (2005). Architecting glocal (global–local), real‐virtual incubator networks (G‐RVINs) as catalysts and accelerators of entrepreneurship in transitioning and developing economies: Lessons learned and best practices from current development and business incubation practices, Technovation. (25), pp. 95–110.

Clarysse ,B.,et al.(2005).spinning out new ventures:A typology of incubation strategies from European research institiutions , Journal of business venturing .Vol.20,No,2, Elsevier,pp,183-216

Creswell,J. W, Plano clark,V.(2011).Designing and conducting mixed methods research (2 nded), thousand oaks, CA: sage

Gibson,D, Naquin,H.(2011).Investing in innovation to enable global competitiveness:The case of Portugal. International Journal of Technological Forecasting & Social Change, 78 .1299–1309.

Gulbrandsen, M., Mowery, C.D.,& Feldman, M.(2011). “Introduction to the special section: Heterogeneity and university–industry relations.Research Policy. 40, pp. 1–5.

Khakbaz,H.Eyvazpour,J. (2013).Stakeholders in the development of network management centers, Technology parks and incubators Journal,Ninth year.No. 34,P 20-24.

Maleki,EJ.and D.M.Tootle.(1996).The role of network in small firm competitiveness, international Journal of Technology management.Vol.11,No.1-2,pp. 43-57

Mirghafuri, S.H. Sayyadituranlou,H. Kariminiya,M. (2013). Ranking factors to promote innovation in companies dependent on incubators with fuzzy Technique, Case study: Yazd science and Technology Park. Technology parks and incubators Journal,Ninth year, No.36.P19-28

Mohaddes,J.(2011). Incubators role in job creation, www. Ideas-to-wealth. Blog.ir    

Perez, M. P., Sanchez, A. M. (2003):The Development of University Spin-Offs: Early Dynamics of Technology Transfer and Networking.

Paavo Ritala.(2012).Incremental and Radical Innovation in Coopetition The Role of Absorptive Capacity and Appropriability.

Putter, J. ( 2011). Higher education and entrepreneurship. Salehi Omran,E.Yahya pour,O.first printing, Babolsar: University of Mazandaran.

Samadimiarkolaye,H Samadimiarkolaye,H.(2013). Theories and models of the relationship between universities and industry in the Knowledge Based Economy. Technology parks and incubators Journal,Ninth year,No.35,p 59-70.

Strauss,A. Corbin, J. (2006). Basics of qualitative research grounded theory principles and practices, Translation: Buick Mohammadi, Tehran: Humanities Institute.

Taylor, P. J., & Ullah, F. (2005). The impact of science park and incubator location on the finance opportunities of technology‐based small firms, In W.E. During, R. Oakey, & S. Kauser (Eds.). New Technology‐Based Firms in the New Millennium. Volume IV, Oxford, UK: Elsevier.

Van Cann, R.(2013).Universities and Incubators. Expert from thesis entitled. Key decisions in the start-up phase of successful software companies.

Zolfaghari,A.Hejazi,S.R.Farhudi,A.(2011).Academic position in the development of entrepreneurship in universities. Technology parks and incubators Journal, seventh year,No.37,p 45-42.