رابطه سبکهای یادگیری با غلبه طرفی مغز دانشجویان بمنظوراستفاده در طراحیهای آموزشی

نویسندگان

1 عضو هیئت علمی دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، واحد مرودشت، مرودشت، ایران

2 - استاد دانشگاه پیام نور

3 - دانشیار دانشگاه پیام نور

4 استادیار دانشگاه پیام نور

چکیده

مهمترین هدف این پژوهش مطالعه و بررسی عوامل مرتبط با توفیق یادگیری دانشجویان مهندسی و پزشکی بود. به همین منظور، دو عامل سبک های یادگیری و غلبه طرفی (برتری نیمکره های مغزی) در دانشجویان دختر و پسر دراین دو رشته تحصیلی مورد بررسی قرار گرفت. مطالعه ازنوع همبستگی بوده و پژوهشگر به مقایسه 178 نفر ازکل دانشجویان دختر و پسر مشغول 89 رشتههای پزشکی و مهندسی دو دانشگاه شیراز و علوم - به تحصیل در نیمسال نخست 88 پزشکی شیراز پرداخت. در این پژوهش از شیوه نمونه گیری خوشه ای استفاده شد و دانشجویان دو پرسشنامه استانداردِ سبک های یادگیری کُلب و غلبه طرفی مغز سیلبر را تکمیل نمودند. تحلیل SPSS وآزمون خی دو و با بکارگیری نرم افزار 17 t آماری داده ها با استفاده از آمار توصیفی، آزمون صورت گرفت. نتایج بدست آمده از این پژوهش حاکی از آن است که دانشجویان دو رشته مهندسی و پزشکی از لحاظ شیوههای درک و پردازش داده ها با یکدیگر تفاوت دارند. همچنین، یافتههای مربوط به سبکهای یادگیری نشان دادند که دانشجویان رشته پزشکی بیشتر از سبک واگرا استفاده می کنند در حالی که دانشجویان رشته مهندسی گرایش بیشتری به سبک همگرا دارند. همچنین، در مقایسه شیوه های یادگیری دختران و پسران دانشجو نتایج نشان دادند که دختران شیوه تجربه عینی را بیشتر بکار میگیرند. در ارتباط با غلبه طرفی مغز بیشتر دانشجویان هر دو رشته تحصیلی از هر دو نیمکره مغز برای درک و پردازش اطلاعات استفاده می نمایند. همچنین، یافتهها حاکی از رابطه بین سبک یادگیری و غلبه طرفی، جنسیت و رشته تحصیلی میباشد
 

کلیدواژه‌ها


عنوان مقاله [English]

A Study of Learning Styles and Hemispheric Dominance in University Students with the intention of Using the Findings in Instructional Planning

نویسندگان [English]

  • M Amini 1
  • A Alipor 2
  • B Zand 3
  • E Ebrahimzadeh 3
  • M Farajelahi 4
چکیده [English]

The main goal of the present research was to investigate factors related to learning success of medical and engineering students. In this regard, two factors, i.e. learning styles and hemispheric dominance of male and female students in these two majors were studied. The study had a comparative nature; for that reason, one hundred and seventy eight medical and engineering students of Shiraz University and Shiraz School of Medical Sciences studying in the first semester of 1388-1389 were compared with each other regarding their learning styles and hemispheric dominances. In this study, cluster sampling was employed to select the participants; then, the selected students completed two standard questionnaires, that is, Kolb’s Learning Style Inventory (1985a) and Silber’s Hemispheric Dominance questionnaire. Statistical analyses (descriptive statistics, t-test, and chi-square) were performed using SPSS software (17th version). Findings of the current study indicate that medical and engineering students are different from each other regarding their methods in perceiving and processing information. With regard to findings of learning styles, it was revealed that medical students mostly used divergent learning style while engineering students were more inclined to employ convergent learning style. Moreover, male and female students were compared regarding their learning styles. This indicated that females utilized concrete experimentation more than males. As regards brain hemispheric dominance, it was observed that most students in the two majors employed both hemispheres of their brains in perceiving and processing information. Besides, the results depicted an association among students’ learning style, hemispheric dominance, gender, and field of study
 

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Hemispheric Dominance
  • Learning Style
  • Information Processing
  • Convergent Style
  • Divergent Style
Alport, G, W. (1937). Personality: A psychological interpretation. New
York: Holt & Co.
Amini, M. (2009). Learning styles and hemispheric dominance in Iranian
gifted students. Paper presented at 17th biennial conference in gifted and
talented children. Vancouver, Canada.
Azizi, F, Khanzadeh, A, Hosseini, M. (2002). A survey on learning styles
of medical students (based on Kolb’s theory) in Qazvin. Iranian Journal of
Medical Education, 2, 16-18. 
Boyle, R, & Honigsfeld, A. (2005). In response to the remarks by
Lawrence H.Summers, presenting empirical data on the differences in
learning styles between males and females, Cardozo Women’s L.J, 11(3).
Caine, R., & Caine, G. (1990). Understanding a brain-based approach to
learning and teaching. Educational Leadership, 48, 66-70.
Campbell, K. (2000). Gender and educational technologies: Relational
framework for learning design. Journal of Educational Multimedia and
Hypermedia, 9(2), 131-149.
Caplan, D. (1981). Prospect of neurolinguistic theory. Cognition, 10 (13),
59-64.
Cassidy, S. (2004).Learning styles: An overview of theories, models, and
measures. Educational Psychology, 24(4), 419-444.
Curry, L. (1983). An organization of learning styles theory and
constructs. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American
Educational Research Association. ERIC document No. ED 235- 185.
Dean, R.S., & Reynolds, C.R. (1997). Cognitive processing and selfreport
of lateral preference. Neuropsychology Review, vol. 7, No.3, 127-
137.
Dunn, R., & Dunn, K. (1978). Teaching students through their individual
learning styles. Reston Va: Preston Co.
Dunn, R .(1980). Learning: A matter of style. Educational Leadership, 44,
18-23.
Entwistle, N. (1981). Styles of learning and teaching. New York: John
Wiley and Sons.
Entwistle, N., & Ramsden, P. (1983). Understanding student learning.
London, GroomHelm.
Felder, R., & Silverman, L. K. (1988). Learning styles and teaching styles
in engineering education. Engineering Education, 78 (7), 674-681.
Felder, R, & Spurlin, J,.(2005). Application, reliability and validity of the
index of learning styles. International Journal of Engineering Education,
21(1), 103-112.
Grasha, A, F. (1996). Teaching with style: A practical guide to enhancing
learning by understanding teaching and learning styles. San Bernardino, CA:
Alliance Publishers.
Grigorenko, E. L. & Sternberg, R. J. (1995). ”thinking Styles”, in D.
Saklofske & Zeidner (ed.), International Handbook of Personality and
Intelligence, New York, Plenum, 205-229.
Harris, A. J. (1975). Lateral Dominance, directional confusion and
reading ability. Journal of Psychology, 44, 283-294.
Haghani,F.,Aminian, B., Kamali, f., Jamshidian, S. (2011). Critical
thinking skills and their relationship with emotional intelligence in medical 
150 رابطه سبک های یادگیری با غلبه طرفی مغز دانشجویان بمنظوراستفاده در...
students of Introductory Clinical Medicine (ICM) course in Isfahan
University of Medical Sciences. Iranian Journal of Medical Education,
10(5), 21-28.
Hiscock, M. (1987). Specialization of the cerebral hemispheres:
Implication for learning. Journal of Learning Disability,20(3).,130-143.
Hosseyni Largani, M., Saif, A.,A. (2001). The comparison of the students
learning styles by gender, academic level and fields of studies. Journal of
Research and Planning in Higher Education, 7(1(19)), 43-60.
Hosseininasab, S, D., Roein, H., Soltanghoraei, KH. (2006). Investigation
the relation between cognitive style and personality factors in C.A students
of Tabriz University. Journal of Psychology(Tabriz University) ,1(2-3), 87-
121.
Hunt, L., Eagle, L., Kitchen, P.J. (2004). Balancing marketing education
and information technology: Matching needs or needing a better match?
Journal of Marketing Education, 26, 70-88.
Hyland, K. (1993). Culture and learning: A study of learning styles of
Japanese students. RELC Journal, 24(2), 69-91.
James, W.B. Gardner, D.L. (1995). “Learning Styles: implications for
distance learning. New Directions for Adult and Continuing Education, 67,
19-32.
Kalbasi, S., Naseri ,M.,Sharifzadeh, G. ,Poursafar, A. (2008). The study
of medical students learning styles in Birjand University. Journal of Medical
Education Development, 5(1), 10-16.
Kalsbeek, D. H. (1989).Linking learning style theory with retention
research: The trails project. The Association for Institutional Research 32.
Kayes, D.C. (2005).International validity and reliability of Kolb’s
learning style inventory version 3 (1999). Journal of Business and
Psychology, 20(2), 249-257.
Keefe, J.W. (1979). Learning styles: An overview in student learning
styles: Diagnosing and prescribing programs, edited by J. Keefe, pp1-
15.Reston VA: National association of secondary school principals.
Keefe, J. W. (1991).Learning style: Cognitive and thinking skills. Reston,
VA: National association of secondary school principals.
Kolb, D.A. (1984).Experiential learning: experience as the sources of
learning and development. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.
Kolb, D. (1985a). Learning style Inventory. Boston, MA: Hay Group,
Hay Resources Director.
Kolb, D. A., Boyatzis, R. E., and Mainemelis, C. (2002). Experiential
learning theory: Previous research and new directions, in Sternberg R. J., and
Zhang L. F., (Eds.). Perspectives on Cognitive, learning, and Thinking
Styles. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum. 
Levy, J. (1983). Research synthesis on right and left hemisphere: we
think with both side of the brain. Educational Leadership, 40, 66-71.
Messick, S. (1976). Individuality in Learning. San Francisco: JosseyBass.
 
Moore, M. ,G . (ED). (2007).The Handbook of Distance Education.,
Second Edition, Mahvah N.J. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Minakari, M. (2006). Investigating psychometric characteristics of
ISALEM-97 and comparison of cognitive learning styles in university
students. Contemporary Psychology, 1(1), 29-39.
Nelson, G.L. (1995). Cultural differences in learning styles in the
ESL/AFL classroom. Boston, MA: Heinle & Heinle, 3-18.
Peirce, W. (2000). Understanding students, difficulties in reasoning, Part
Tow: The perspective from research in learning style [online]. Retrieved
from: http://academic.pg.cc.md.us/ peirce/ MCCCTR/diffpt2.html.
Rahmani Shams, H. (2000). The relationship of learning style and
personality characteristics of medical, engineering and art students. M.A
Dissertation , Allameh Tabataba’i University.
Restak, R. (1984). The Brain. New York: Bantam.
Riding, R. & Cheema, I. (1991). ” Cognitive Styles: an overview and
integration, Educational Psychology: An International Journal of
Experimental Educational Psychology, 11(3-4), 193-215.
Roy, M., & Chi, M.T. C. (2003). Gender differences in pattern of
searching the web. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 29 (3), 335-
348.
Saeedian, M. (2006). The study of relationship between hemispheric
dominance and leadership styles among Shiraz Medical School’s
Administrators. MA Dissertation, Shiraz Islamic Azad University.
Silber, L. (1998). Time management for the creative person: Right Brain
Strategies. Three Rivers Press: New York.
Sousa , D.,A. (1995). How the Brain Learns. Virginia: NASSP.
Sperry, R.W. (1964). The great cerebral commissure. Scientific
American, 210(1), 425-427.
Springer, S., P.& Deutsch, G. (2002). Left-Brain, Right-Brain. New
York, N.Y:W.H. Freeman & Company.
Sternberg, R. J. (1997). Thinking Styles. USA, Cambridge University
Press.
Sternberg, R.J., and Zhang, Li-Fong.(2000). Styles of thinking as basis of
differentiated instruction. Theory into Practice, 44(3), 245-253.
Sudman, S. (1976). Applied Sampling. New York: Academic Press. 
Valizadeh, L., Fathiazar, E., Zamanzadeh, V. (2006). Nursing and
Midwifery students’ learning styles in Tabriz Medical University. Iranian
Journal of Medical Education, 6(2), 136-140.
Veres, J. G., Sims, R.R., & Locklear, T.S. (1991).Improving the
reliability of Kolb’s revised learning style inventory. Educational and
Psychological Measurement, 51: 143-150.
White, J. A., & Anderson, P. (1995). Learning by internal medicine
residents: differences and similarities of perceptions by residents and faculty.
Journal of Gen Items Med, 10, 126-132.
Yarmohammadi, V., M. (2000). The comparison of learning styles in
Teachers and Students of different schools. M.A. Dissertation , Allameh
Tabatabae’i University.(in Persian)
Yazdi, S., M. (2009). The study and comparison of learning styles and
learning modes of students in different School of Alzahra University. New
Thoughts on Education, 5(2), 123- 142. (in Persian)