بررسی تأثیر عوامل فردی بر خلاقیت مدیران مدارس متوسطه نواحی چهارگانه شهر شیراز

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 کارشناس ارشد مدیریت آموزشی،رئیس دبیرستان شبانه روزی معراج آباده طشک

2 استادیار دانشگاه شیراز

چکیده

هدف پژوهش حاضر بررسی تأثیر عوامل فردی بر خلاقیت مدیران مدارس متوسطه شهر شیراز بود. روش تحقیق این پژوهش توصیفی از نوع همبستگی بود، جامعه آماری تمامی‌مدیران دبیرستانهای دولتی(195 نفر) بودند که در سال 1388 در شهر شیراز در مدارس متوسطه مشغول فعالیت بودند. نمونه شامل 130 نفر از افراد جامعه بود که به روش تصادفی خوشه‌ای سهمیه‌ای از جامعه انتخاب شد. حجم نمونه به‌وسیله فرمول کوکران برآورد گردید. ابزارهای به کارگرفته شده دراین پژوهش، پرسشنامه خلاقیت رندسیپ و پرسشنامه عوامل فردی مؤثر بر خلاقیت بود. قبل از اجرا روایی و پایایی ابزارهای پژوهش بررسی و اعتبار ابزارها محرز شد. به منظور بررسی سوالات پژوهش از ضریب همبستگی پیرسون و رگرسیون چندگانه استفاده شد. نتایج حاصل از تجزیه و تحلیل اطلاعات نشان می‌دهد عوامل فردی بر خلاقیت مدیران مدارس مؤثر بوده و پیش‌بینی کننده‌ی معنی‌دار خلاقیت مدیران می‌باشند. ویژگی‌های شخصیتی، سبک شناختی، سبک تفکر و دانش، از جمله عوامل فردی مؤثر بر خلاقیت هستند. همچنین تجزیه و تحلیل اطلاعات حاصل نشان می‌دهد مدیران مدارس متوسطه شهر شیراز از خلاقیت نسبتاً پایینی برخوردار هستند.
 

کلیدواژه‌ها


عنوان مقاله [English]

A Survey of Shiraz Islamic Azad University with regard to Learning Organization from the Perspective of Faculty Members

نویسندگان [English]

  • Z Sarchehani 1
  • J Jahani 2
چکیده [English]

This survey addressed Shiraz Islamic Azad University with regard to learning organization from the perspective of its faculty members in the academic year 2010-2011. The target population involved all the faculty members at Shiraz Azad University (N=271). With this end in view, 160 respondents were selected using random sampling. The instrument used was the standard Learning Organization Measurement questionnaire which taps five characteristics of learning organizations such as leadership, human resources, organizational design, organizational culture, and organizational mission/ strategy dimensions. The reliability of this questionnaire was calculated using Cronbach’s alpha and its validity was subjected to the judgment of professors and experts. A use was made of both descriptive (frequency & percentage) and inferential statistics (t-test). The results of the study indicated that Shiraz Islamic Azad University as a learning organization attended to dimensions of leadership characteristics (M=3.5) to an extent above the mean, human resources (M=3.06) around the mean, organizational design (M=2.85), and organizational culture (M=2.79), and strategy/ mission (M=2.76) below the mean.
 

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Shiraz Islamic Azad University
  • learning organization
  • Professors’ stances
Agahi, B.(2002). Relationship between cognitive style independence -
field dependence and creativity in middle school students in
Isfahan, , M.A. Unpublished Thesis, Isfahan University.
Amabile, T.M., (1988). A model of creativity and Innovation in
organization. In: Staw, B. M. And cumming, L. L., Editor,
(1988). Research in organizational Behavior vol. 10,JAI Press,
Greenwich, CT, pp. 123-167.
Amabile, T.M. (1998). How to Kill Creativity. Harvard, Business
Review Sept-Oct: 77-87.
Amabile, T. M. (1996). Creativity in context. New York: west view
Press: 67.
Baba Ali, F.(2005). Comparison of styles and its relationship with
creative thinking among students of humanities and art Tehran
universities, Al-Zahra (SA). Psychology and Education Sciences.
M.A Unpublished. Thesis, Al-Zahra University.
Barbara, k. and kamea, G. (2003). “Mea Suring Creativity in
research and practice”. Arizona state University.
Buckingham, M & Clifton, D. O. (2001). Now, Discover Your
Strengths. The Free Press.
Connelly C.E (2001), promoting Creativity in software development,
London,
Ontario Queen’s School of Business, Queen’s University.
 Csikszentmihalya, M., (1997). Creativity: Flow and psychology of
discovery and invention.,Harper Collins, New York.
 Csikszentmihalya, M., (1999). Implications of a system
perspective for the study of Creativity. In: strenberg, R. J.,
Editor, (1999). Handbook of -Creativity, Cambridge University
Press, Cambridge, UK, pp. 493-502. 
Ghahreman, Tabrizi, K. (2005) The relationship between
organizational culture and leadership style with innovative physical
education faculty members at universities. Teacher Training
University in Tehran. Faculty of Physical Education and Sport
Sciences, Ph.D Unpublished. Thesis Tehran University.
Grabner, I.(2007), Managing Organizational Creativity Motivational
aspects of management control systems for creative employees.
Wirtschafts universität Wien,Nordbergstrasse 15, A-1090 Wien,
Austria16th EDAMBA Summer Academy ,Soreze, France, July
2007.
 Isaksen, s. and lauer , K. (2001). Convergent validity of the
situational out look Questionnaire: discriminating levels of
perceived support for Creativity”. North American , Journal
of Psychology. Vol. 3, No. 1: 31.
khosravani ,S .(2005). the relationship between creativity and the five
factors of personality and mental health, M.A Unpublished. Thesis
Tehran University.
kirton, m.g .(1999) . manual: kirton adaptation – innovation
inventory,3rd ed.Hatfield,uk: occupational research centre.
Mackinnon, W. D. (1970). The personality correlates of creativity:
Astudy of American architects. In P.E. Vernon (Ed), creativity:
selected reading (pp.289-311). New York: penguin Books.
Moghimi, M. (2002) .Approach Manager Research Organization,
Tehran, Nashre terme.
Nelson, D. L. and Quick, J. G. (1994)."organizational
behaveour:Fundayions, realities,and challenges".New York:west
Publishing company:305-307.
Niknami, M. pour Zahir, A. T. Delavar. A. Ghaffari Majlj.
M.(2009). Design and evaluation of causal models of educational
administrators' innovation and Creativity in Tehran. Quarterly
Journal of New Approaches in Educational Adminastration, 
Marvdasht Islamic Azad University, vol. 2/ no. 5/ fall 2009, pages
1-28
Nokar, A.R. (2008), individual and organizational factors affecting
creativity presidential institution employees, M.A. Unpublished
Thesis, Tehran University.
Norouzy, Sadaf. (2007), cognitive styles. Journal Science Education
Compass, no. 184:84
Pandey ,S. (2009), Organizational Factors for Exploration and
Exploitation, J. Technol. Manag. Innov. 2009, Vol 4, Issue 1.
Runco,M. A. (2007),Creativity,Research,Development,and practice.
Chapter 1,Cognative and creativity,pages 1-38,
Runco M. A. (2007), Creativity,Research,Development,and practice.
Chapter 10, Enhance ment and Fulfillment creativity,pages 319-
373
Sadeghi Mal Amiri. M. (2005). Design & Specify a model for provide
Context for creativity in the investigative institutions, PH.D
Unpublished Thesis, Tehran University.
Sadeghi Mal Amiri. M. (2007). Creativity a systemic approach,
Imam
Hossein University antsharat , Tehran
Samdani, M. (2006). Investigating the relationship between
personality characteristics of creativity in an area education
managers Kerman, Kerman University. Faculty of Literature and
Humanities . M.A. Unpublished Thesis Kerman University
Sam Khani, M. R. (2002); creativity and innovation in organization
and management education, nashre art Spand Tehran
Satton, R. I. (2001)".The weird rules of creativity".Harvard business
review:89-103. 
Shalley. C. & Gilson. L. (2004). What leaders need ti know: A
review of social and contextual factors that can foster or
hinder Creativity. Dupree college of Managment , Georgia
Institute of technology: 8-9
Shahraray. M. Madani Pour, R.(1996) Creative and Innovative
Organization Knowledge. Management Magazine, No. 33, 34,
Summer 1996
Siadat.S.A. et al, (2007), The exact nature of the relationship between
job creation of employees supervisors.in the guardians of Isfahan
Steel Plant. Journal of Administrative Sciences, Isfahan University
of Economy. Nineteenth year No. 2 of 2007;53-68
Standler, R. (1998). Creativity in science and engineering,
,Creativity,intelligence,and personality.annua review of
psychology,32:439-476.
Witkin ,H.A.& Cox .(1977).Field-dependent& field independent
cognitive styles &their educational implications. ReviewOf
educational Research, 1-64.
Woodman, R. W., sawyer, J. E., & Griffin, R. W. (1993).
Toward a theory of Organizational Creativity. Academy of
Management Review, 18, 293-321.