الگو‌یابی ساختاری خودکارآمدی شغلی و انگیزش یادگیری بر یادگیری غیررسمی با نقش میانجی یادگیری رسمی (مورد مطالعه:کارکنان شرکت آب منطقه‌ای خراسان رضوی)

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

• ابوالفضل قاسم زاده ¹
• مهدی کاتب ²
• روح اله مهدیون ¹
• محمد رزاقی ³

¹ دانشیار مدیریت آموزشی، دانشکده علوم تربیتی و روانشناسی، دانشگاه شهید مدنی آذربایجان، تبریز، ایران

² کارشناس ارشد آموزش و بهسازی منابع انسانی، دانشکده علوم تربیتی و روانشناسی، دانشگاه شهید مدنی آذربایجان، تبریز، ایران

³ دانشجوی دکتری مدیریت آموزشی، دانشکده ادبیات و علوم انسانی، دانشگاه ارومیه، ارومیه، ایران

10.30495/jedu.2023.26670.5329

چکیده

مقدمه: هدف پژوهش حاضر، بررسی تاثیر خودکارآمدی شغلی و انگیزش یادگیری بر یادگیری غیررسمی کارکنان با در نظرگرفتن نقش میانجی یادگیری رسمی بود.
روش شناسی: پژوهش حاضر به لحاظ هدف کاربردی و از لحاظ  نحوه­ی گردآوری داده­ها توصیفی از نوع همبستگی مبتنی بر مدل­یابی معادلات ساختاری می­باشد. جامعه آماری پژوهش شامل همه ی کارکنان شاغل در شرکت آب منطقه­ای خراسان رضوی به تعداد 400 نفر بود. برای تعیین حجم نمونه از جدول مورگان استفاده شد و تعداد 196 نفر به عنوان نمونه انتخاب شدند که گزینش آن‌ها با استفاده از روش طبقه­ای نسبتی صورت گرفت. جهت اطمینان از برگشت پرسشنامه‌ها تعداد 205 پرسشنامه در جامعه آماری توزیع شد. به­منظور گردآوری داده­های پژوهش از چهار پرسشنامه استاندارد خودکارآمدی شغلی، انگیزش یادگیری، یادگیری غیر رسمی و یادگیری رسمی استفاده شد که ضریب آلفای کرونباخ آن­ها به ترتیب 76/0، 76/0، 65/0 و 86/0 به دست آمد و روایی صوری و محتوایی آن‌ها با استفاده از نظر متخصصان تایید شد. تجزیه­و­تحلیل داده­ها به روش مدل­یابی معادلات ساختاری و با استفاده از دو نرم­افزار SPSS و LISREL انجام شد.
یافته­ ها: نتایج نشان داد: بین متغیرهای خودکارآمدی شغلی و یادگیری غیررسمی و همچنین بین متغیرهای انگیزش یادگیری و یادگیری غیررسمی رابطه مستقیم و معنی­داری وجود ندارد. بین متغیرهای یادگیری رسمی و یادگیری غیررسمی و همچنین بین هر کدام از متغیرهای خودکارآمدی شغلی و انگیزش یادگیری به­طور مستقیم با یادگیری رسمی رابطه  مثبت و معنی­داری وجود دارد. متغیرهای خودکارآمدی شغلی و انگیزش یادگیری به واسطه نقش میانجی یادگیری رسمی با یادگیری غیررسمی رابطه غیرمستقیم و معنی­داری داشتند.
نتیجه ­گیری: بنابراین براساس یافته­های پژوهش نقش میانجی یادگیری رسمی و رابطه مستقیم بین متغیر یادگیری رسمی نیز با متغیر یادگیری غیررسمی تایید گردید. اما مسیر مستقیم خودکارآمدی شغلی و انگیزش یادگیری با یادگیری غیررسمی تایید نشد بلکه رابطه این مسیر با میانجی‌گری یادگیری رسمی تایید گردید.

کلیدواژه‌ها

• خودکارآمدی شغلی
• انگیزش یادگیری
• یادگیری غیررسمی
• یادگیری رسمی

---

عنوان مقاله [English]

Structural modeling of job self-efficacy and learning motivation on non-formal learning with a mediating role of formal learning (Case study: Khorasan Razavi Regional Water Company employees)

نویسندگان [English]

• abolfazl ghasemzadeh ¹
• mahdi kateb ²
• rouhollah mahdiuon ¹
• mohammad razzaghi ³

¹ 1. Associate Professor of Educational Administration, Faculty of Education and Psychology, Azarbaijan Shahid Madani University, Tabriz, Iran

² 2. M.A. in Training and Development Human Resource, Faculty of Education and Psychology, Azarbaijan Shahid Madani University, Tabriz, Iran

³ Ph. D Student in Educational Administration, Faculty of Literature and Humanities, Urmia University, Urmia, Iran

چکیده [English]

Introduction: The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of job self-efficacy and learning motivation on informal learning of employees by considering the mediating role of formal learning.
Methods: This research is applied in terms of purpose and based on a descriptive correlational research method based on structural equation modeling. The statistical population of this study included all all employees of the Khorasan Razavi Regional Water Company with 400 people. Morgan table was used to determine the sample size and 196 people were selected as the sample who were selected using the relative class method. 205 questionnaires were distributed in the statistical population to ensure the return of the questionnaires. In order to collect research data, four standard questionnaires of job self-efficacy, learning motivation, informal learning and formal learning were used. respectively, whose Cronbach's alpha coefficient is 0.76, 0.76, 0.65 and 0.86 was obtained and their content validity was confirmed by experts. Data analysis was performed by structural equation modeling using SPSS and LISREL software.
Results: The results showed that there is no direct and significant relationship between job self-efficacy and informal learning variables and also between learning motivation and informal learning variables. There is a positive and significant relationship between formal learning and informal learning and also between each of the variables of job self-efficacy and learning motivation directly with formal learning. The variables of job self-efficacy and learning motivation had an indirect and significant relationship with informal learning due to the mediating role of formal learning.
Conclusion: Therefore, based on the research findings, the mediating role of formal learning and the direct relationship between formal learning variable and informal learning variable were also confirmed. However, the direct path of job self-efficacy and learning motivation with non-formal learning was not confirmed, but the relationship between this path and formal learning mediation was confirmed.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

• job self-efficacy
• learning motivation
• informal learning
• formal learning

مراجع

1. Aminalroaya, S., Ahmadi, Q., & Nadi, M. (2009). Examination of relationship between the components of the learning organization with non-formal learning at the girls' high schools in Isfahan. Journal of Leadership and educational administration, 3 (2), 73 - 491. [in Persian].
2. Ashoori, J., Talepasand, S., & Bigdeli, I. (2011). The role of otivational strategies, cognitive learning strategies and learning from peers in predicts of the English language academic progress. Journal of new psychological research, 6 (24). [in Persian].
3. Bahn, D. (2006). Orientation of nurses towards formal and informal learning: Motives & perceptions. University of Hull.
4. Bandura, (1997). Perceived self-efficacy in congnitive development and functioning. Educational psychologist, 28(2), 117-148.
5. Berg, S. A., & Chyung, S. (2008). Factors that influence informal learning in the workplace. Journal of Workplace Learning, 20(4), 229–244.
6. Bizhani, , Moradi, H., & Karami, Q. (2011). The study of the concept and its motivation in adult education programs, social, economic. Scientific and cultural of work and community, 133(1). [in Persian].
7. Budlaei, H., Kushki, A., Sattari, R. (2010). Organizational learning and trust as mediating links between psychological empowerment and organizational commitment. Journal of Management Process in Development, 24(1), 67-93. [in Persian].
8. Caffaralla, R S., & Merriam, S. B. (1999) Learning in adulthood: A comprehensive guide. San Frncisco: Jossey_Bass .
9. Choi, W., & Jacobs, R. L. (2011). Influences of formal learning, personal learning orientation, and supportive learning environment on informal learning. Human Resource Development Quarterly, 22(3), 239-257.
10. Choi, W. (2009). Influences of formal learning, personal characteristics, and work environment characteristics on informal learning among middle managers in the Korean banking sector (Doctoral dissertation, The Ohio State University).
11. Conlon, J. (2005). A review of informal learning literature, theory and implications for practice in developing global professional competence. Journal of European Industrial Training, 28(3), 283-295.
12. Conner, Marcia. L. (2005). Informal learning. Available in; http: ageless learner com/ intros / informal.html.
13. Cook, J., & Smith, (2004). Beyond Formal learning: Informal, community learning. Learning technology research institute. London. Metropolitan university.
14. Cunningham, J., & Hillier, E. (2013). Informal learning in the workplace: key activities and processes. Education + Training, 55 (1), 37– 51.
15. Doornbos, A. J., Bolhuis, S., & Simons, P. R. J (2004). Modeling work-related learning on the basis of intentionality and developmental relatedness: a noneducational perspective. Human Resource Development Review, 3(3), 74-250.
16. Ellinger, A. D., & Cseh, M. (2007). Contextual factors influencing the facilitation of others' learning through everyday work experiences. Journal of Workplace Learning, 19(7), 435-452.
17. Ellinger, A. D. (2005). Antecedents and consequences of coaching behavior. Performance Improvement Quarterly, 16(1), 5-28.
18. Elliot, A. J., & Mc Gregor, H. (2001). A 2×2 Achievement Goal Framework. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80(3), 501-519.
19. Ellstrom, P. E. (2001). Integrating learning and work: problems and prospects. Human Resource Development Quarterly, 12 (4), 35- 421.
20. Erfani, N. (2017). The Intermediary Role of Learning Motivation in Predicting Academic Achievement Based on the Students’ Cognitive and Metacognitive Strategies. Journal of Educational Psychology Studies, 14(26), 167-198. [in Persian].
21. Farrokhi, N., & Ahmadrad, F. (2020). The Relationship of Job Related Affective Well-Being and Job Stress with Job Satisfaction: The Mediating Role of Job SelfEfficacy. Journal of Industrial and Organizational Psychology Studies, 7(2), 283-300. [in Persian].
22. Ghasemzadeh Alishahi, A., Razzaghi, M., & MasoomiKia, F. (2020). The Role of Learning and the Organizational Traning Climate in Job Performance: Orrganizational Learning Capacity Part. Journal of Managing Education in Organizations, 9(1), 147-174. [in Persian].
23. Ghorbani, H., Hakimzadeh, R., & Gashmardi, M. (2013). Studying the role and structure of motivation in foreign language learning based on information processing model (case study of Iranian oil terminals company). linguistic studies in foreign languages, 2 (1), 59-76. [in Persian].
24. Hanvaisch, S., Sivakumar, K., & Tomas, G. (2006). The relation of learning and memory with organizational performance. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 34 (4), 455-470.
25. Harrison, P. (2011). learning culture, line manager and HR professional practice. Journal of European Industrial traning, 35(9), 914-928.
26. Jacobs, R. L., & Park, Y. (2009). A proposed conceptual framework of workplace learning: Implications for theory-building and research in human resource development. Proceedings of the Annual Conference of the Academy of Human Resource Development, Washington, DC: AHRD.
27. Jeong, S., Han, S. J., Lee, J., Sunalai, S., & Yoon, S. W. (2018). Integrative literature review on informal learning: antecedents, conceptualizations, and future directions. Human ResourceDevelopment Review, 17(2), 128-152.
28. Kadivar, P., Tavousi, M., & Yosefi, N. (2010). Study of the relationship between learning styles and selfefficacy beliefs with mathematical progress.Research Educational, 2 (5), 107 - 122. [in Persian].
29. Kateb, M. (2016). The relationship of job self-efficacy and learning motivation with informal learning: The mediator role of formal learning among employees of Khorasan Razavi Regional Water Company. Master Thesis, Shahid Madani University of Azerbaijan. [in Persian].
30. Kaveh, M. (2010). Motivation and learning. Journal of Electronic learning, 1(1), 23- 29. [in Persian].
31. Lohman, M. C. (2006). Factors influencing teachers' engagement in informal learningactivities. Journal of workplace learning, 18(3), 141-156.
32. Lohman, M.C. (2005). Factors influencing teacher's engagement in informal learning activities. Journal of work place learning, 18(3), 147-156.
33. Machin, M. A., & Fogarty, G. J. (2003). Perceptions of training-related factors and persoanl variables as predictors of transfer implementation intentions. Journal of Business and Psychology, 18(1), 51-71.
34. Malcolm, J., Hodkinson, P., & Colley, H. (2003). Informality and formality in learning: a report for the Learning and Skills Research Centre. Learning and Skills Research Centre.
35. Marashian, F, Safarzadeh, S. (2013) the role of organizational learning and job motivation in the anticipation of job self - efficacy and organizational entrepreneurship of employees. Journal of social psychology (new findings in psychology), 8(29), 85-98. [in Persian].
36. Marsick, V. (2006). Informal strategic learning in the workplace. In Work-related learning, 51-69, Springer Netherlands.
37. McEvoye, G. M. (2005). A competency model for developing human resource professionals. Journal of management Education, 29(3), 383-402.
38. Mirheidari, A., siadat, S., Hoveida, R., & Abedi, M. (2012). The anizational learning relationship and job path self-efficacy with Managers' work engagement. Scholarly-Scientific, Quarterly new approach in educational management, 3(3). [in Persian].
39. Mirkamali, S. M., & Hoseini, S. R. (2008). Examination of the relationship between spirit and self-efficacy of teacher. Training centres, 3 (4), 133 - 148.
40. Najafi, T., Atashi, S.H., & Jafari, A. (2012). Examin and Compare the state of formal and unofficial learning status and its sources in the students (case study of an officer of Imam Ali). The Scientific Quarterly Journal of Military Management,12 (48), 226-197. [in Persian].
41. Noe, R. A., & Schmitt, N. (1986). The influence of trainee attitudes on training effectiveness: Test of a model. Personnel Psychology, 39, 497–523.
42. Park, Y., & Choi, W. (2016). The effects of formal learning and informal learning on job performance: the mediating role of the value of learning at work. Asia Pacific Education Review, 17(2), 279-287.
43. Rowden, R., & Conine, C. T. (2005). The impact of workplace learning on job satisfaction in small US commercial banks. Journal of Workplace Learning, 17(4), 215–230.
44. Sambrook, S. (2005). Factors influencing the context and process of work-related learning: Synthesizing findings from two research projects. Human Resource Development International, 8(1), 101-119.
45. Seyed Javadin, S. (2002). Examining the factors related to the learning motivation of students of Tehran University. The magazine of Complex Qom Higher Education, 4(15), 221 - 256.
46. Shelly A., Berg, S. A., & chyung, S.y. (2008). Factors that influence informal learning in the workplace. Journal of workplace learning, 20(4), 229-244.
47. Shir Mohammadzadeh, H., Ghasemzadeh Alishahi, A., & Kazemzadeh Beytali, M. (2018). The Mediator Role of Occupational Self-Efficacy in the Relationship Between Professional Development and Job Commitment and Satisfaction Among Sports and the Youth Department’s Staff. Journal of Ergonomics, 6(1), 30- 39. [in Persian].
48. Sobhani Nejad, M. (2006). Learning Organization. Tehran: Citron. Educational Skills. [in Persian].
49. Soltani Pereshkafti, N. (2019). The model for the development of faculty members of Payame Noor University based on informal learning using the foundation data theory (Payame Noor University of Hormozgan). Journal of New Approaches in Educational Administration, 10(40), 312-342. [in Persian].
50. Straka, G. A. (2011) Informal and implicit learning: Concepts, communalities and differences. European Journal of Vocational Training, 4(2), 132-145.
51. Svensson, L., Ellström, P. E., & Åberg, C. (2004). Integrating formal and informal learning at work. Journal of Workplace Learning, 16(8), 479-491.
52. Talja, S. (2007). The role of formal and informal learning. Journal of workplace elearning , 19, 469-481.
53. Tharenou, P. (2001). The relationship of training motivation to participation in training and development. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 74, 599–621.
54. Torrence, D.R. (1993). Motivating trainees to learn. Journal of Training and Development. March.
55. Van woerkom, M., Nijhof, W. J., & Nieuwenhuis, L. F. (2002). Critical reflective working behavior: A survey research. Journal of European Industrial Training, 26(8), 375–383.
56. Woojae, C., & Ronald, L. J. (2011). Influences of Formal Learning, Personal Learning Orientation, and Supportive Learning Environment on InformalLearning. Human Resource Development Quarterly, 22(3).
57. Zeraatkar, S. (2015). Design of informal learning patterns of human resource managers in country large organizations using the narrative approach. Human Resource Management Research of Imam Hussein, 7 (3), 131 – 151. [in Persian].
58. Zeraatkar, S. (2020). Identify the stimuli and consequences of informal learning using the heuristic mixed method. Iranian Journal of Public Administration Misson, 10 (36), 113-128. [in Persian].